Dharmeratnam Sivaram (Taraki)
Taraki died defending the Tamil cause’- Tamil Guardian
5 May 2005
"Our feelings over his
killing are reflected in Taraki’s own words, penned
fifteen years ago, after his close friend, Richard de
Soyza, was almost identically abducted, tortured and
murdered:
“I salute a friend and fellow journalist most gruesomely
murdered by those who dare not show their faces nor
advance or protect their interests as honourable and
brave men do. In the land where people were proud of the
Sinhala lion, desperate jackals roam, seeking out their
defenceless prey. Richard and many more have been
brutally murdered; who or what is to be blamed? The
collective psyche of the Sinhala people? Enough of this
silent impotence. The terrorists have to be resisted.
Extreme cowardice and a gnawing lack of self esteem as
usual seem to be at the source of this faceless
terrorism. Therefore it should be collectively resisted
before it starts to knock on every door looking for
victims to torture and kill, thereby to reassure itself
of its existence.”
“Even those inured to Sri Lanka’s brutal political violence
and vicious ethnic conflict would have been shocked by the
murder last week of Dharmeratnam Sivaram (Taraki). The political
columnist and military analyst was arguably one of Sri Lanka’s
best known media figures. His brazen abduction and execution, as
CPJ quite rightly put it, must surely challenge the
self-delusive optimism of those who believe that Sri Lanka can
be reformed into a pluralist democracy. There can be no doubt
Sri Lankan military intelligence is responsible for the murder,
even if hairs are split as to whether the trigger was pulled by
a Sinhala trooper or a Tamil paramilitary. The question is not
simply whether anyone at the top of the state authorised the
killing, but where in the machinery is the logic that will
ensure Taraki’s extra-judicial killing will not be the last and,
like that of every single murdered journalist - not to mention
tens of thousands of other unknown individuals, will never be
investigated or punished.
“Why was Taraki killed? For many, the answer seems obvious: he
was a Tamil Tiger supporter. Yes, he was a Tamil patriot. He
carried a rifle for the freedom struggle before he picked up a
pen. But he was not always a backer of the Tigers. Indeed he
once stood opposed to the LTTE, before he subsequently came to
see it as the most viable vehicle for his beloved cause (not
least given his military insight). But was it something he wrote
or something he did that made him a marked man? Had he broken
any of Sri Lanka’s repressive laws, the state wouldn’t have
hesitated to put him in the dock. He earned its ire differently.
“As many have pointed out, it was his writing that did much to
promote the Tamil struggle. (Shamefully, some writers in the
south have sought to rationalise his murder on the basis of his
boldly sympathetic writing for the Tamil cause - they ought to
ask themselves what it says of Sri Lanka that this is sufficient
rationale for abduction and execution). Fluent and articulate in
English and Tamil, Taraki was one of Sri Lanka’s most
influential columnists. In a field laden with hyperbole and
zeal, Taraki’s writing compelled prevailing understandings to be
questioned rather than simply foist his own views on readers.
That is why his column was eagerly awaited by all sides of Sri
Lanka’s political divides.
Caught up in an activist mentality, the plethora of writing
on Sri Lanka’s conflict has, over the years, consistently failed
to explain the escalation of violence or growth of the Tamil
independence struggle. In particular, amid the nationalist
fervour with which much of Sri Lanka’s Sinhala-dominated media
hailed the military onslaughts of the 90’s against the Tigers,
Taraki mockingly questioned the reality they presented with
counterarguments that came, no doubt without design, given who
his publishers were, to boost Tamil morale at critical lows. He
earned the widespread respect he came to receive. Through his
columns and, perhaps most tellingly, through the TamilNet
website, Taraki drove home another point: accuracy is more
important for credible media than objectivity. All of us, after
all, have valid opinions. His death will sadden those on all
sides prepared to listen to rational, even if contrary,
arguments. Our feelings over his killing are reflected in
Taraki’s own words, penned fifteen years ago, after his close
friend, Richard de Soyza, was almost identically abducted,
tortured and murdered:
“I salute a friend and fellow journalist most gruesomely
murdered by those who dare not show their faces nor advance or
protect their interests as honourable and brave men do. In the
land where people were proud of the Sinhala lion, desperate
jackals roam, seeking out their defenceless prey. Richard and
many more have been brutally murdered; who or what is to be
blamed? The collective psyche of the Sinhala people? Enough of
this silent impotence. The terrorists have to be resisted.
Extreme cowardice and a gnawing lack of self esteem as usual
seem to be at the source of this faceless terrorism. Therefore
it should be collectively resisted before it starts to knock on
every door looking for victims to torture and kill, thereby to
reassure itself of its existence.”