International Conference on the Conflict in Sri Lanka:
Peace with Justice, Canberra, Australia, 1996SOUTH AFRICA'S "MIRACLE":
HOPE, INSPIRATION AND LESSONS
FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE IN SRI LANKA
Pravin J. Gordhan M.P.
Chairperson, Portfolio Committee on Constitutional Affairs, South Africa.
1. INTRODUCTION
Since the 1940's South Africa has been a subject on the agenda of the international
community and its organisations. Today from the polecat of the world, notorious for
decades for its policy of apartheid, it serves as one of the models of a successful
transition from minority rule to democracy.
The people of South Africa have established a constitutional state based on democratic
values such as universal franchise, multi-party democracy, non-racialism, non-sexism and
equality and liberty based on a Bill of Rights.
However, human conflict, violations of human rights, deprivation of political rights,
sectarian discrimination and religious strife are all international phenomena and plague
humanities body politic resulting in the loss of life and the perpetuation of violence as
a means of resolving political conflict.
Equally perennial has been humanity's search for peace, harmony and co-operation. For
the peaceful resolution of political conflict.
This conference on the ever-deteriorating conflict in Sri Lanka is an indication of the
kind of international concern which was demonstrated by the international community in
solidarity with our struggle for freedom in South Africa. May I pay tribute to the valiant
efforts of the organisers of this conference to focus the minds of the international
community on Sri Lanka and the search for peace and reconciliation by its peoples.
It is my humble privilege to share with you our experiences in South Africa with a
fervent desire to contribute to the achievement of peace and justice in Sri Lanka. South
Africa's transition to democracy and the painful transformation of apartheid's legacy has
much to offer other communities and nations. But we will be the first to say that no one
country's experience can be mechanically translocated to another.
Each country has its own unique history, social composition, social forces, political
dynamics and cultural and other idiosynchracies. These are the ultimate determinants and
shapers of the trajectory that any peace effort will follow. At the same time the
experiences of South Africa has many lessons to offer, many pitfalls to avoid and many
creative ideas to adapt to the specific conditions of another country.
2. SOUTH AFRICA'S HISTORICAL CONTEXT
South Africa's apartheid system is well known among the participants of this
conference. This system was based on racial oppression and class exploitation. It deprived
the black majority of their political rights; excluded them from meaningful participation
in the economy; neglected the socio-economic development of majority; inculcated and
perpetuated a colonial and racist ideology; physically partitioned South Africa in
implementing its Bantustan policies; and developed the "white" part of the
country along first world standards and the blacks along third world standards.
The apartheid system created a number of political parties that participated in the
various political structures in the homelands and in the old Parliament. These forces
ultimately became participants in the negotiations process.
These measures were buttressed by a ruthless and efficient security force which was
used to impose the worst forms of repression. Today the Truth and Reconciliation
Commission is beginning the process of uncovering the brutality of the apartheid regime.
In the last 30 years apartheid governments had the backing of several western
countries. The ANC as the leading liberation movement enjoyed virtually total support from
most `third world' countries and the Scandinavian countries.
In addition, the ANC built a formidable underground organisation within the country.
The armed struggle intensified in the 1980s matched by intense mobilisation and mass
struggles within the country.
The call for the racist minority regimes to negotiate with the ANC occurred throughout
the decades of non-violent resistance prior to the illegalization of the ANC in 1960.
In 1961, just before his arrest, President Mandela once again issued a plea to the
minority government to enter into negotiations. Instead, repression was intensified.
It was the decolonization process in the former Portuguese colonies of Mozambique and
Angola, the independence of Zimbabwe, the defeat of the South African army in Angola and
the subsequent negotiated settlement in Namibia which spurred oppressed South Africans.
In the case of Sri Lanka, a careful evaluation is required of the international and
sub-continental context to establish whether external factors favour a peace initiative.
Certainly the cautious progress in the Palestinian territory and the early stages of the
process in Northern Ireland suggest that the trend towards finding negotiated solutions
still exist.
3. SEARCH FOR A BEGINNING
However, negotiations as a mechanism to resolve local and other issues became
increasingly prominent in the mid-1980s - at the same time as severe repression was
unleashed, accompanied by a state of emergency. It was in the midst of this period that
President Mandela, while prisoner at Robben Island, wrote to P.W. Botha, as head of
government, urging Botha to meet with him to discuss an end to the senseless violence
sweeping the country at the time.
This marked the beginning of a long process of cautious and tentative contact between
the ANC leadership in exile and various role-players from within the ruling bloc:
- the very first contact was between a few academics from the Afrikaaner
establishment and the ANC;
- followed by, contact between security force heads and the ANC - each
anticipating that they would be seeing the devil himself in their adversary!
- the first contact between monopoly business interests and the ANC leadership
in exile
- delegations of leading Afrikaaner intellectuals and academics meeting the
ANC in Africa
- contact between the ANC and Afrikaaner media representatives;
- by 1988 there was a stream of delegations from the country making contact with
and entering into dialogue with the ANC in exile;
The Commonwealth initiated a process in 1985/6 resulting in the establishment of the
EMINENT PERSONS GROUP. The former Prime Minister of Australia, Mr Malcolm Fraser was among
the Group which met with the ANC, apartheid government, the United Democratic Front and
other role-players within the country. This initiative collapsed.
At the same time, within the country:
- NGOs were creating forums where government representatives and anti-
apartheid activists were debating and exchanging views
- by 1987 intensive debates and research was taking place on policies for the post-
apartheid period
- foreign governments began to invite ANC aligned activists and leaders to visit
their countries and get first hand experience and knowledge of various matters
- large numbers of post-graduate and undergraduate students left the country to advance
their academic development in preparation for the post- apartheid period
What are the lessons of this period?
The mobilisation of international opinion on an informed and sustained basis certainly
earned the ANC the `high moral ground' and increasingly isolated the apartheid regime.
International opinion must today do everything to support peace efforts in Sri Lanka. The
mobilisation of the broadest possible alliance of internal forces across ideological,
political, religious and sectoral divides is critical to create an internal climate for
change. Central to this process must be a growing resolve for peace and reconciliation
among all role-players in your country.
Initiating some contact and dialogue between even peripheral members of each `side' is
critical to the breaking of rigid perceptions built over decades. This contact could be
between sections of the intelligentsia on either side; it could be facilitated and driven
by the religious leaders. Elements in the media need to be exposed to all dimensions of
the problem. Equally crucial is the need for sections of the security forces to be exposed
to the possibilities of peaceful co-existence.
4. KEY ELEMENTS OF OUR `MIRACLE'
South Africa's `miracle' had many dimensions which reflected of both external and
internal objective conditions and the subjective factor. In other words, developments
inside and outside South Africa created a balance of political and military forces which
required political leaders and organisations to consider negotiations as an option.
It was clearly emerging by the late 1980's that a negotiated solution might be an
alternative to political and military conflict. The ANC acknowledged its political
superiority and its immediate inability to defeat the apartheid military. The National
Party government conceded its political weakness and understood that an intensification of
the military option would devastate South Africa.
Whilst it is impossible to capture the full complexity of our process here the
following elements were crucial:
- convergence of a whole range of factors which created conditions for the political
leaders to take the initiative;
- having a leadership in the dominant political parties who had the vision, political
will and the courage to seek a negotiated solution;
- constructing a uniquely South African negotiations process and culture
- conceiving and negotiating a phased transition process which assured both stability
and transformation at the same time
- testing the boundaries of conventional wisdom and creativity
- sought a win-win solution where the country will be victor not just a party
- created a whole new culture of `national unity' where consensus politics cohabited
with majoritarianism;
- merged ideology and pragmatism
- determination to find a South African solution negotiated by South Africans.
The question which arises is how these factors will be reflected in the Sri Lankan
case. It is my firm belief that both this conference and the role-players in Sri Lanka
must concretely address these issues in an effort to focus the collective mind to the
process of shaping the peace process in Sri Lanka.
The following sections will briefly outline:
a) South Africa's negotiation process
b) The nature of South Africa's negotiated package
c) The transition process in South Africa.
5. THE NEGOTIATION PROCESS
The following schematically captures the main stages in the negotiation process in
South Africa:
5.1 EARLY CONTACT
This is the exploratory or `feeling out' stage which took place in the mid-1980's
involving contact between the ANC and various individuals and agencies connected to the
minority government.
5.2 CONCEPTUALISING PROCESS AND CONTENT
Before entering the negotiations stage, the ANC prepared and sought support for the
Harare Declaration which set out the ANC's vision of the principles, pre-conditions and
stages of the negotiation process.
5.3 BILATERAL PREPARATORY TALKS
This stage involved talks between Nelson Mandela and F.W. de Klerk which laid the basis
for some minimum level of trust and understanding. The pre-conditions of the ANC included
the unbanning of the ANC, the release of political prisoners and the return of exiles.
5.4 CREATING CONDITIONS
This entailed the release of senior ANC leaders from prison, the actual unbanning of
the ANC and the free entry of ANC exiles to prepare for talks.
5.5 TALKS-ABOUT-TALKS
This stage was formally initiated by the signing of the Groote Schuur Minute in May
1990 signalling the commitment of the ANC and NP to find a negotiated solution and set
into motion a process to release political prisoners and address other issues. This was a
long and complex period.
5.6 PREPARATION FOR NEGOTIATIONS
These were bilateral negotiations developing the process and structures for the
negotiations process. During this period the ANC united various forces within a patriotic
front.
5.7 INITIAL NEGOTIATIONS
This stage was initiated in November 1991, with 20 organisations who met to decide upon
the negotiations process. This result in the establishment of the Conference for a
Democratic South Africa (CODESA). Lasting about 6 months this stage revealed that
government was not ready for serious negotiations and was instead pursuing a `double
agent' - violence and negotiations. The ANC pulled out of these talks.
5.8 THE FINAL COMMITMENT
Intense internal pressure and a refusal to engage in any full bilateral talks by the
ANC, eventually resulted in the signing of a Record of Understanding between Mr. Mandela
and Mr. de Klerk. This laid the basis for the resumption of talks.
5.9 FINAL NEGOTIATIONS
These commenced in March 1993, and resulted in an agreement on:
a) a transition process which was multi-stage
b) an interim constitution to be implemented after the first democratic election
c) the date of the first democratic election - 27 April 1994
d) the establishment of a Transitional Executive Council to level the playing fields
and
create conditions for a fair and free election. It worked for about 5 months before
the elections.
e) the establishment of an Independent Electoral Commission to run the elections.
f) the basis for drafting of a `final' constitution by an elected Constitutional
Assembly.
g) several other measures
6. TRANSITION PROCESS
South Africa's transition to democracy is a long and complex one. Whilst there might be
the appearance of a definite switch from apartheid to democracy, the following stages give
some indication of the process which emerged from the negotiations:
a) the unbanning of the ANC and the negotiating process described above;
b) the Transitional Executive council (December 1993 - April 1994) which signalled a
muted form of "dual power"
c) the elections for a new national parliament and provincial legislators and a
Government of National Unity for 5 years.
d) the drafting of the "final" constitution (finished 8 may, 1996) and it's
implementation
e) local government in South Africa had it's own transition process which is likely to
be completed in 1999.
These periods only apply to changes in the political structures. South Africa has many
distortions. Government adopted a Reconstruction and Development program to transform all
major aspects of life in South Africa. Each country or situation will give rise to a
different transition process to meet the needs of the specific context.
7. SOUTH AFRICA'S HISTORICAL COMPROMISE
The interim constitution drafted during the negotiation reflects the political
settlement between the major antagonists. The following are some of the main aspects:
a) A Government of National Unity which offered appointees to parties who obtained more
than 10% of the vote to participate in government thus ensuring inclusivity and stability
b) A proportional representation electoral system permitting a wide range of parties to
be in parliament
c) All civil servants were guaranteed their jobs and current salary levels
d) Politicians in the apartheid parliament were guaranteed their pensions - even if
they were re-elected to the new parliament
e) A provision for the possibility of ancestry, in a sprit of reconciliation, to the
old security forces
f) A number of provisions which dilute full democracy at the local government level
g) The establishment of a Volkstat Council to promote sections of the Afrikaner
community to explore self-determination options
These elements reflect our attempts to obtain stability, democracy and transformation
and, at the same time meet the main concerns of various groups
A MESSAGE OF HOPE
This brief overview of the South African Transition to democracy demonstrates the
complexity both of our situation and the solution we found for our problems. All sides in
Sri Lanka, I suggest, need to realise the long term limitation of the military option.
Every effort must now be made to influence and shape circumstances in and outside Sri
Lanka to favour a political settlement.
Peace, Justice and reconciliation for all the people of Sri Lanka must come sooner
rather than later. There has been enough suffering, pain, destruction and death. Now is
the time for the people of Sri Lanka, to cease the moment, to shape their own destiny, to
demand that political leaders find the will to lay the foundation for peace and justice. |