|
CONTENTS
OF THIS SECTION
Last updated
18/12/08 |
|
 |
|
Tamil Eelam Struggle
for Freedom - the International Frame |
|
The Indian Ocean Region
|
|
How Independent States Come into Being
- A Case Study of Israel |
|
Template for peace is inclusion -Paul
Keating, 23 August 2008 |
|
Global Economy |
|
Meaningful Capitalism:
Change We Can Believe In - Alex Pattakos, 17 December 2008 |
|
On Socialism for the
Rich - Bellamy Foster, 10 October 2008 |
|
Understanding
Politics & Wall Street - Who is Henry Paulson?, 23 September 2008 |
|
On Boom & Bust - UK
Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown - Speech to Labour Party Conference,
2000 together with Lee Kuan Yew's Remarks on 25 September 2008 |
|
Global Priority: Feed
the Markets, Starve the Hungry - Devinder Sharma, 22 September 2008 |
|
Behind The Costly
Fannie/Freddie Mortgage Bailout: A Silent Dependence On Foreign Money, Not
Just Oil - Danny
Schechter, 8 September 2008 |
|
Understanding Financial Mania and Systemic Risk
- 'Leveraged Buy Outs', 'Private Equity', 'Hedge Funds' -
An interview with Damon Silvers, June 2007 |
|
US &
the Age of Empire |
|
The Denial of Poverty and Empire
- Saul Landau, 16 November 2008 |
|
US
Presidential Election, 2008 |
|
The Anti-Empire Report
- William Blum, 10
September 2008 |
|
War Made Easy - The Movie |
|
Wouldn't it
be nice to live in an ideal world with no violence and brutality - Andre Vltchek, 17 April 2008 |
|
Strategic Focus: U.S. Military Footprint,
Courtesy Foreign Policy in Focus, 2 March 2008 |
|
"You Can't Lump All Terrorists
Together" - Hillary Clinton, 23 October 2007 |
|
Chavez Warns that Bolivia
is Being Destabilized by U.S. - Just as Venezuela, 10 September 2007 |
|
 |
|
America,
America, War Paar Ada! Audio Video Presentation, August
2007 |
|
Shift Happens - "Look back over the past, with its changing empires
that rose and fell, and you can foresee the future, too." -
Marcus Aurelius A.D.169 |
|
The unipolar moment of US
supremacy has passed - Timothy Garton Ash, 24 January 2007 |
|
Venezuela President Hugo Chavez
Speech to the United Nations, 16 September 2006 |
UN Imperialism:
unleashing entrepreneurship in the developing world -
Paul Cammack,
Manchester Metropolitan University, December 2006 |
|
Thank you, President Bush - Paul
Coelho, 11 March 2003 |
|
Friendly Dictators |
Audio Visual Presentation
Noam Chomsky on the Pessimism of the Intellect and the Optimism of the
Will - BBC Interview |
|

Part 1

Part 2 |
|
How Much Longer? -
Eduardo Galeano, 2006 |
|
India &
the Multi Lateral World |
|
Hunger in India States
Alarming, 14 October 2008 |
|
Divisions on the Rise in
India - Manmohan Singh, 13 October 2008 |
|
Bush signs US-India nuclear bill
8 October 2008 |
|
US approves Indian nuclear deal,
2 October 20008 |
|
Whither India? Two Views
- Top Down and Bottom Up, 14 September 2008 |
|
Empires Don't Build Rivals - Justin Podur
, 5 August 2008 |
|
China hails Sonia's
'milestone' visit, for better ties, 27 October 2007 |
|
60 Years of
Independence: India’s Foreign Policy Challenges - Shyam Saran, 30 August
2007 |
|
Indian economic policy is
hijacked by a small elite - Mani Shankar Iyer
, Minister for Panchayati Raj at the
Confederation of Indian
Industry, 3 May 2007 |
|
US House of Representatives allows export of
civilian nuclear fuel to India, 9 December 2006 |
|
"India's N-Deal only with the US"
- says US Envoy Nicholas Burns,
1 March 2008 |
|
India takes the lead in South Asia arms purchase
|
| The
Buddha Smiled, Nadesan Satyendra, 1998 |
|
United States, India & Pakistan -
Stephen Cohen, 1997 |
| Irritants to Calibration,
Nadesan Satyendra,
1993 |
| Good Bye, Non Alignment!,
Nadesan Satyendra,1993 |
| India & US - the Calibrated Approach,
Nadesan Satyendra,1992 |
|
China &
the Multi Lateral World |
|
Shanghaied - new
international institution threatens U.S. interests, 30 April 2004 |
|
A Lesson in Foreign
Policy: When China taught Vietnam a Lesson with US Support -
Zbingniew Brzezinski |
Russia &
the Multilateral World |
|
On the Unipolar World - Vladimir Putin,
President of Russian Federation, 10 February 2007 |
|
Why Russia recognised independence of South Ossetia
and Abkhazia - Dmitry Medvedev, President of
Russia, Financial Times,
28 August 2008 |
|
The Georgian Dogs Of August - Or Shmucks Of Our Time
-Saul Landau, 27 August 2008 |
|
Russia's Upside in the Georgia
Conflict - Boris Kagarlitsky, 22 August 2008 |
|
The Russo-Georgian War and
the Balance of Power - George Friedman, 12 August 2008 |
|
United States, Russia & Pravada |
|
|
|
Kafka Has A Rival - The
British Foreign Office Lectures Us On
Human Rights - John Pilger, 1
December 2008 |
|
The Lies Of Hiroshima Are The
Lies Of Today - John Pilger 6
August 2008 |
|
Hiroshima & Nagasaki
"How could I ever forget that flash of light!
In a moment thirty thousand people ceased to be ..."
Toge Sankichi: Hibakusha (A-bomb survivor)
|
| The
Second Super Power - James F.Moore, 2003 "...There
is an emerging second superpower, but it is not a nation.
Instead, it is a new form of international player, constituted by the
“will of the people” in a global social movement..." |
Art, Truth & Politics - Harold
Pinter, Nobel Lecture, 2005 "I believe
that despite the enormous odds which exist, unflinching, unswerving,
fierce intellectual determination, as citizens, to define the real truth
of our lives and our societies is a crucial obligation which devolves
upon us all. It is in fact mandatory." more |
|
US
special forces operate 'inside Iran'
|
|
Project Syndicate -
an international association of 244 newspapers in 114 countries, devoted to
bringing distinguished voices from across the world to local audiences
everywhere... |
|
The Age of Empire in
England |
|
Revisionist TV history of Britain's
empire is an attempt to justify the new imperial order - Wilson, 2003 |
|
On the Invasion of Iraq |
|
Kosovo |
|
Don't Forget Yugoslavia - John Pilger
, 16 August 2008 |
|
Kosovo:
The global significance of independence - Bruce
Fein, 24 February 2008 |
|
Kosovo's 'Supervised Independence',
17 February 2008 |
|
U.S. and EU
ready to recognize Kosovo Independence - if
Serbia does not agree on role of the province, 24 September 2007 |
|
How Silent are the 'Humanitarian'
Invaders of Kosovo? - John Pilger, 2004 "..Muted by the evidence of
the Anglo-American catastrophe in Iraq, the international "humanitarian"
war party ought to be called to account for its largely forgotten
crusade in Kosovo...Lies as great as those of Bush and Blair were
deployed by Clinton and Blair in their grooming of public opinion for an
illegal, unprovoked attack on a European country..." more |
|
NATO, Kosovo & Tamil Eelam,
Nadesan Satyendra,
1999 |
|
Understanding Kosovo,
Nadesan Satyendra, 1998 |
|
Vietnam |
|
About the War in Vietnam -
Vietnam is a Country - not a War
|
|
A Lesson in Foreign Policy: Tonkin
Gulf Lie which Launched Vietnam War |
|
Ho Chi Minh & Lydon Johnson
- Exchange of Letters , February 1967 |
|
Japan |
| Japan's Cheque Book Diplomacy,
Nadesan Satyendra,
1992 |
|
Online Journals |
| Z-Net
: A Community
of People Committed to Social Change
|
| New
Internationalist |
| Third
World Traveler |
| Democracy
Now |
|
Znet
Blogs "..If you look
carefully, you will notice some new features in these blogs. First, there is
a 'blog of blogs', a blog amalgamating all of the znet blogs in one
place..." |
|
Think Tanks |
| Rand
Organisation |
|
Defence Institute of International Legal Studies |
| The Project for the New
American Century |
| Think Tank Without Walls |
| International
Hemispheric Resource Centre |
|
Project Against the Present Danger - Standing in Defense of International
Law, International Cooperation, and Multilateralism |
| A
New World of Ideas, Analysis, & Policy Options for America |
| Brookings
Institution |
| Heritage
Foundation |
| Cato
Institute |
| The
World Bank |
| Knowledge
at Wharton - Business Insights |
|
Special Report on U.S. Foreign Military Training:
Global Reach, Global Power, and Oversight Issues - Lora Lumpe,
Foreign Policy In Focus, May 2002 |
|
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic
Relations, 1961 |
|
Offsite Links |
Federation of American
Scientists
".. Our founders were members of the Manhattan Project, creators of the atom
bomb and deeply concerned about the implications of its use for the future
of humankind. FAS is the oldest organization dedicated to ending the
worldwide arms race and avoiding the use of nuclear weapons for any
purpose..." |
|
Power & Interest News Reports
"The Power and Interest News Report (PINR) is a global
organization that provides analyses of conflicts and other international
events. We are currently independently funded giving us the freedom to
analyze objectively. PINR seeks to provide insight into various conflicts,
regions and points of interest around the globe. We approach a subject based
upon the powers and interests involved, leaving the moral judgments to the
reader." |
|
Gateway
to Astronaut Photography of the Earth |
| The
White House |
| George
W. Bush |
| American
Foreign Policy Council |
|
US State Department - Patterns of Global Terrorism Reports |
| Institute
for War & Peace Reporting |
| Foreign
Policy - the Magazine of Global Politics |
| Janes's
Information Group |
| International
Institute of Strategic Studies |
| Center
For Strategic & International Studies |
| Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe
(OSCE) |
| Begin-Sadat
Center for Strategic Studies |
| Center
for Security Studies and Conflict Research |
| Canadian
Institute of Strategic Studies |
| Center
for Strategic Studies, Belgrade |
| Center
for Defense Information |
| Transparency
International |
| South
Asia Intelligence Review |
| South
Asia Terrorism Portal |
| Institute
of Peace and Conflict Studies, New Delhi |
| Indian Armed Forces |
| Danish
Institute of International Affairs |
| Swedish
Institute of International Affairs |
| Royal
Institute of International Affairs |
| Canadian
Institute of International Affairs |
|

Visit the
Library - International Relations
|
|
|
International Relations
in THE AGE OF EMPIRE
"Just because you don't take an interest in politics
doesn't mean politics won't take an interest in you."-
Pericles, 430 BC
"We have no eternal
allies and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and
perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow."
- British Foreign Secretary,
Lord Palmerston (1784-1865)
" Imperialism is an institution under which one nation
asserts the right to seize the land or at least to control the
government or resources of another people."-
John T. Flynn
"We
don't seek empires.
We're not
imperialistic.
We
never have been. I can't imagine why you'd even ask the question."
US Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, questioned by an al-Jazeera
correspondent, April 29, 2003.
"No
one can now doubt the word of America"
US
President George W. Bush, State of the Union, January 20, 2004 (quoted
in Empire Notes)
"...All oppressed nations
want independence. Everything is subject to change...In the past,
Britain made war on us many times. Britain, the United States, Japan,
France, Germany, Italy, tsarist Russia and Holland were all very
interested in this land of ours. They were all our teachers by negative
example and we were their pupils..."US
Imperialism is a Paper Tiger - Mao Tse Tung, 1956
"...We don't want anyone to own another person as a
slave. We don't want anyone to employ wage slaves, either. Nor do we
want anyone to politically coerce and repress others, to fold, spindle,
or mutilate others, to rape, or to deny, defy, or crucify others..."
Michael Albert "Remember this: We be many and they be few. They need us more than we
need them. Another world is not only possible, she is on her way. On a
quiet day, I can hear her breathing."
Arundhati Roy
The Age of Imperialism - an Online History of the United States
"...The idea of manifest destiny gained popularity
in the 1830s and 1840s. (The term was coined in 1845 by newspaper
columnist John L. O'Sullivan.) As people began settling the western
territories, wresting control of the land from the original Native
American inhabitants, many Americans came to believe that it was
their nation's "manifest destiny" to possess all of the North
American continent. Later in the century, this idea easily gave way
to larger dreams of expanding America's influence around the
world.."
The Genocide of the American
Indian
“The most ultimately righteous of all wars is a war with savages, though it is apt to be also the most terrible and inhuman. The rude, fierce settler who drives the savage from the land lays all civilized mankind under a debt to him. American and Indian, Boer and Zulu, Cossack and Tartar, New Zealander and Maori,
- in each case the victor, horrible though many of his deeds are, has laid deep the foundations for the future greatness of a mighty people. The consequences of struggles for territory between civilized nations seem small by comparison. Looked at from the standpoint of the ages, it is of little moment whether Lorraine is part of Germany or of France, whether the northern Adriatic cities pay homage to Austrian Kaiser or Italian King; But it is of incalculable importance that America, Australia, and Siberia should pass out of the hands of their red, black, and yellow aboriginal owners, and become the heritage of the dominant world races.” The Winning of the West Vol. 4 The Indian Wars Page 56
by President Theodore (Teddy) Roosevelt
more
Imperialism the Highest Stage of Capitalism - V.I.Lenin, 1916
"..in its economic essence imperialism is monopoly
capitalism. This in itself determines its place in history, for
monopoly that grows out of the soil of free competition, and
precisely out of free competition, is the transition from the
capitalist system to a higher socio-economic order...
Monopolies, oligarchy, the striving for domination and not for
freedom, the exploitation of an increasing number of small or weak
nations by a handful of the richest or most powerful nations - all
these have given birth to those distinctive characteristics of
imperialism which compel us to define it as parasitic or decaying
capitalism..."
more
The flag
follows the dollar and the soldiers follow the flag - Major General
Smedley Butler, Unites States Marine Corps, 1933
"War is just a racket. A racket is best described, I
believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of
people. Only a small inside group knows what it is about. It is
conducted for the benefit of the very few at the expense of the
masses. I believe in adequate defence at the coastline and nothing
else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then we'll fight. The
trouble with America is that when the dollar only earns 6 percent
over here, then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100
percent. Then the flag follows the dollar and the soldiers follow
the flag.
I wouldn't go to war again as I have done to
protect some lousy investment of the bankers. There are only two
things we should fight for. One is the defence of our homes and the
other is the Bill of Rights. War for any other reason is simply a
racket.
There isn't a trick in the racketeering bag that the
military gang is blind to. It has its "finger men" to point out
enemies, its "muscle men" to destroy enemies, its "brain men" to
plan war preparations, and a "Big Boss"
Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism.
It may seem odd for me, a
military man to adopt such a comparison. Truthfulness compels me to.
I spent thirty-three years and four months in active military
service as a member of this country's most agile military force, the
Marine Corps. I served in all commissioned ranks from Second
Lieutenant to Major-General. And during that period, I spent most of
my time being a high class muscle-man for Big Business, for Wall
Street and for the Bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster
for capitalism.
I suspected I was just part of a racket at
the time. Now I am sure of it. Like all the members of the military
profession, I never had a thought of my own until I left the
service. My mental faculties remained in suspended animation while I
obeyed the orders of higher-ups. This is typical with everyone in
the military service.
I helped make Mexico, especially
Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make
Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to
collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central
American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of
racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the
international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where
have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican
Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to
see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.
During
those years, I had, as the boys in the back room would say, a swell
racket. Looking back on it, I feel that I could have given Al Capone
a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three
districts. I operated on three continents."
more
The day is not far off when we are going to have to deal in straight power
concepts - George Kennan,
Director of Policy Planning of the U.S. Dept. of State,
State Department Briefing, 1948 -
"...we have about 50% of the world's wealth but only
6.3% of its population. This disparity is particularly great as
between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we
cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real
task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships
which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity
without positive detriment to our national security. To do so, we
will have to dispense with all sentimentality and day-dreaming; and
our attention will have to be concentrated everywhere on our
immediate national objectives. We need not deceive ourselves that we
can afford today the luxury of altruism and world-benefaction.
For these reasons, we must observe great restraint in our attitude
toward the Far Eastern areas. The peoples of Asia and of the Pacific
area are going to go ahead, whatever we do, with the development of
their political forms and mutual interrelationships in their own
way. This process cannot be a liberal or peaceful one. The greatest
of the Asiatic peoples - the Chinese and the Indians - have not yet
even made a beginning at the solution of the basic demographic
problem involved in the relationship between their food supply and
their birth rate. Until they find some solution to this problem,
further hunger, distress, and violence are inevitable. All of the
Asiatic peoples are faced with the necessity for evolving new forms
of life to conform to the impact of modern technology. This process
of adaptation will also be long and violent. It is not only
possible, but probable, that in the course of this process many
peoples will fall, for varying periods, under the influence of
Moscow, whose ideology has a greater lure for such peoples, and
probably greater reality, than anything we could oppose to it. All
this, too, is probably unavoidable; and we could not hope to combat
it without the diversion of a far greater portion of our national
effort than our people would ever willingly concede to such a
purpose.
In the face of this situation we would be better off to dispense now
with a number of the concepts which have underlined our thinking
with regard to the Far East. We should dispense with the
aspiration to “be liked” or to be regarded as the repository of a
high-minded international altruism. We should stop putting
ourselves in the position of being our brothers' keeper and refrain
from offering moral and ideological advice. We should cease to talk
about vague and - for the Far East - unreal objectives such as
human rights, the raising of the living standards, and
democratization. The day is not far off when we are going to
have to deal in straight power concepts. The less we are then
hampered by idealistic slogans, the better..."
more
The Military Industrial
Complex,
Farewell Speech, Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1961
"... we have been compelled to create a permanent
armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a
half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense
establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the
net income of all United States corporations... The total influence
- economic, political, even spiritual - is felt in every city, every
State house, every office of the Federal government.... In the
councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of
unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military
industrial complex...The potential for the
disastrous rise of
misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the
weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic
processes. We should take nothing for granted. ... Only an
alert and
knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the
huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful
methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper
together..."
States? Sovereignty? The Dilemmas of Capitalists in an Age of Transition
- Immanuel Wallerstein , 1997
"... interference by one state in the affairs of another is
common currency, and the entire corpus of international law
(admittedly a weak reed) represents a series of limitations on
outward sovereignty. In any case, strong states notoriously do not
reciprocate fully recognition of the sovereignty of weak states. So
why is such an absurd idea put forth?
...The sovereignty of the states - their inward and outward
sovereignty within the framework of an interstate system - is a
fundamental pillar of the capitalist world-economy. If it falls, or
seriously declines, capitalism is untenable as a system. I agree
that it is in decline today, for the first time in the history of
the modern world-system. This is the primary sign of the acute
crisis of capitalism as an historical system. The essential
dilemma of capitalists, singly and as a class, is whether to take
full short-run advantage of the weakening of the states, or to try
short-run repair to restore the legitimacy of the state structures,
or to spend their energy trying to construct an
alternative system. Behind the rhetoric, intelligent defenders
of the status quo are aware of this critical situation. While they
are trying to get the rest of us to talk about the pseudo-issues of
globalization, some of them at least are trying to figure out what a
replacement system could be like, and how to move things in that
direction. If we don't want to live in the future with the
inegalitarian solution that they will promote, we should be asking
the same question..."
more
Thomas Friedman, "A Manifesto for the Fast World", New York Times
Magazine, March 28, 1999
"As the country that benefits most from global
economic integration, we have the responsibility of making sure that
this new system is sustainable.. The hidden hand of the market will
never work without a hidden fist - McDonald's cannot flourish
without McDonnell-Douglas, the designer of the F-15. And the
hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley's
technologies is called the US Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine
Corps....The global system cannot hold together without an activist
and generous American foreign and defense policy. Without America
on duty, there will be no America Online...
There is a saying in Silicon Valley that "loyalty is just one
mouse-click away." But you can take that too far. Execs there make
boasts like: "We are not an American company. We are I.B.M. U.S.,
I.B.M. Canada, I.B.M. Australia, I.B.M. China." Oh, yeah? Then, the
next time I.B.M. China gets in trouble in China, call Jiang Zemin
for help. And the next time Congress closes another military base in
Asia, call Microsoft's navy to secure the sea lanes of the Pacific.
And the next time Congress wants to close more consulates and
embassies, call Amazon.com to order a new passport. This doesn't
mean America needs to be involved everywhere all the time. There are
big, important places and there are small, unimportant places.
Diplomacy is about knowing the difference between the two,
and knowing how to mobilize others to act where we cannot or
should not act alone.."
more
Rebuilding
America's Defenses - Project for the New American Century, 2000
"...American land power is the essential link in the
chain that translates U.S. military supremacy into American
geopolitical pre eminence... Elements of U.S. Army Europe should be
redeployed to Southeast Europe, while a permanent unit should be
based in the Persian Gulf region...In Southeast Asia, American
forces are too sparse to address rising security requirements
adequately... No U.S. strategy can constrain a Chinese
challenge to American regional leadership if our security guarantees
to Southeast Asia are intermittent and U.S. military presence a
periodic affair. For this reason, an increased naval presence in
Southeast Asia, while necessary, will not be sufficient;
as in the Balkans, relying solely on allied forces or the rotation
of U.S. forces in stability operations not only increases the stress
on those forces but undercuts the political goals of such missions.
For operational as well as political reasons, stationing rapidly
mobile U.S. ground and air forces in the region will be required...
..Since today’s peace is the unique product of
American pre eminence, a failure to preserve that pre eminence
allows others an opportunity to shape the world in ways antithetical
to American interests and principles...Global leadership is not
something exercised at our leisure, when the mood strikes us or when
our core national security interests are directly threatened; then
it is already too late. Rather, it is a choice whether or not to
maintain American military pre eminence, to secure American
geopolitical leadership, and to preserve the American peace..."
more
Military-Industrial Complex Revisited, 1999-2002 - William D. Hartung,
Foreign Policy in Focus
"...Contrary to initial expectations, the
military-industrial complex did not fade away with the end of the
cold war. It has simply reorganized itself. As a result of a rash of
military-industry mergers encouraged and subsidized by the Clinton
administration, the "Big Three" weapons makers—Lockheed Martin,
Boeing, and Raytheon—now receive among themselves over $30 billion
per year in Pentagon contracts. This represents more than one out of
every four dollars that the Defense Department doles out for
everything from rifles to rockets...President Eisenhower’s warning
about the "acquisition of unwarranted influence" by the
military-industrial complex is as relevant today as it was in 1961.
Despite the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and the breakup of the
Soviet Union, the U.S. military budget is higher today than it was
when Eisenhower gave his military-industrial complex speech in 1961"
more
The Enemy
Within - Gore Vidal, 2002
"...Joseph Schumpeter in 1919, described ancient
Rome in a way that sounds eerily like the United States in 2001:
'There was no corner of the known world where some interest was not
alleged to be in danger or under actual attack. If the interests
were not Roman, they were those of Rome's allies; and if Rome had no
allies, the allies would be invented. The fight was always invested
with an aura of legality. Rome was always being attacked by
evil-minded neighbours.' We have only outdone the Romans in turning
metaphors such as the war on terrorism, or poverty, or Aids into
actual wars on targets we appear, often, to pick at random in order
to maintain turbulence in foreign lands..."
more
Noam Chomsky on
Dominance and its Dilemmas, 2003
"The new imperial grand strategy presents the US as
a revisionist state seeking to parlay its momentary advantages into
a world order in which it runs the show, a unipolar world in which
no state or coalition could ever challenge it as global
leader, protector, and enforcer. These policies are fraught with
danger even for the US itself...Violence is a powerful instrument
of control, as history demonstrates. But the dilemmas of dominance
are not slight...""
more
Arundhati Roy in Confronting Empire, 2003
"..it is a myth that the free market breaks down
national barriers. The free market does not threaten national
sovereignty, it undermines democracy. As the disparity between the
rich and the poor grows, the fight to corner resources is
intensifying. To push through their "sweetheart deals," to
corporatize the crops we grow, the water we drink, the air we
breathe, and the dreams we dream, corporate globalization needs an
international confederation of loyal, corrupt, authoritarian
governments in poorer countries to push through unpopular reforms
and quell the mutinies.
Corporate Globalization - or shall we call it by its
name? - Imperialism - needs a
press that pretends
to be free. It needs courts that pretend to dispense justice.
Meanwhile, the countries of the North harden their borders and
stockpile weapons of mass destruction. After all they have to make
sure that it's only money, goods, patents and services that are
globalized. Not the free movement of people. Not a respect for human
rights. Not international treaties on racial discrimination or
chemical and nuclear weapons or greenhouse gas emissions or climate
change, or - god forbid - justice.
So this - all this - is "empire." This loyal
confederation, this obscene accumulation of power, this greatly
increased distance between those who make the decisions and those
who have to suffer them....Our fight, our goal, our vision of
Another World must be to eliminate that distance.
Remember this: We be many and they be few. They need us more than
we need them. Another world is not only possible, she is on her
way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing."
more
Parecon
- Life after Capitalism - Michael Albert
"The structure of capitalism is flawed. The motor that powers it
cannot but vastly increase the disparity between the poor and the
rich globally and within countries as well. Parecon is a brave
argument for replacing that flawed machine and offers a much needed
-- more equitable, democratic, participatory -- alternative economic
vision."
more
Behind the Invasion of Iraq
- Aspects of India's Economy - December 2002
"Readers of Aspects will no doubt be
surprised at the fact that we have chosen to bring out a special issue
apparently not on any aspect of India’s political economy, but on the
impending US assault on Iraq. However, we believe the two - India’s
political economy and the most important current world development - are
connected, and as the current offensive drive unleashed by the US
worldwide proceeds, the implications for our region will become clearer.
Even as the US prepares to launch a massive assault on Iraq, it has
declared India to be its most important military ally in the Asian
region (not including west Asia)—this despite the fact that it has
three bases in Pakistan at the moment... Not only is the US
increasingly dependent on West Asian oil for its own consumption; its
capture of West Asian oil is also intended to secure its supremacy among
imperialist powers. The global crisis of overproduction is showing up
the underlying weakness of the US real economy, as a result of which US
trade and budget deficits are galloping. The euro now poses a
credible alternative to the status of the dollar as the global reserve
currency, threatening the US’s crucial ability to fund its deficits by
soaking up the world’s savings. The US
anticipates that the capture of Iraq, and whatever else it has in store
for the region, will directly benefit its corporations (oil, arms,
engineering, financial) even as it shuts out the corporations from other
imperialist countries. Further, it intends to prevent the bulk of
petroleum trade being conducted in euros, and thus maintain the dollar’s
supremacy...."
Howard Zinn in My Country: The World, May 2003
"Our
government has declared a military victory in Iraq. As a patriot, I
will not celebrate. I will mourn the dead -- the American GIs, and
also the Iraqi dead, of which there have been many, many more. I
will mourn the Iraqi children, not just those who are dead, but
those who have been be blinded, crippled, disfigured, or
traumatized, like the bombed children of Afghanistan who, as
reported by American visitors, lost their power of speech..
When a government recklessly expends the lives of its young for
crass motives of profit and power (always claiming that its motives
are pure and moral ("Operation Just Cause" was the invasion of
Panama and "Operation Iraqi Freedom" in the present instance) it is
violating its promise to the country.... With the war in Iraq won,
shall we revel in American military power and, against the history
of modern empires, insist that the American empire will be
beneficent? The American record does not justify confidence in its
boast that it will bring democracy to Iraq.
Should Americans welcome the expansion of the nation's power, with
the anger this has generated among so many people in the world?
Should we welcome the huge growth of the military budget at the
expense of health, education, the needs of children, one fifth of
whom grow up in poverty?
I suggest that a patriotic American who cares for his country might
act on behalf of a different vision. Instead of being feared for
our military prowess, we should want to be respected for our
dedication to human rights. Should we not begin to redefine
patriotism?... Should we not begin to consider all children,
everywhere, as our own?.. Tom Paine used the word "patriot" to
describe the rebels resisting imperial rule. He also enlarged the
idea of patriotism when he said: "My country is the world. My
countrymen are mankind." ...
Arundhati Roy on Public
Power in the Age of Empire
" There is no discussion taking place in the world today that is
more crucial than the debate about strategies of resistance. And the
choice of strategy is not entirely in the hands of the public. It is
also in the hands of sarkar. After all, when the U.S. invades and
occupies Iraq in the way it has done, with such overwhelming
military force, can the resistance be expected to be a conventional
military one? (Of course, even if it were conventional, it would
still be called terrorist.) In a strange sense, the U.S.
government's arsenal of weapons and unrivalled air and fire power
makes terrorism an all-but-inescapable response. What people lack in
wealth and power, they will make up with stealth and strategy. In
this restive, despairing time, if governments do not do all they can
to honor non violent resistance, then by default they privilege
those who turn to violence. No government's condemnation of
terrorism is credible if it cannot show itself to be open to change
by to non violent dissent...
|
US and Europe going
head-to-head on World Economic Dominance - G.Heard, 2003
"Why
is George Bush so hell bent on war with Iraq? Why does his
administration reject every positive Iraqi move? It all makes sense
when you consider the economic implications for the USA of not going
to war with Iraq. The war in Iraq is actually the US and Europe
going head to head on economic leadership of the world."
|
The Optimism of
Uncertainty - Howard Zinn, November 2004
"..the struggle for justice should never be abandoned because of
the apparent overwhelming power of those who have the guns and the
money and who seem invincible in their determination to hold on to
it. That apparent power has, again and again, proved vulnerable to
human qualities less measurable than bombs and dollars: moral
fervor, determination, unity, organization, sacrifice, wit,
ingenuity, courage, patience - whether by blacks in Alabama and
South Africa, peasants in El Salvador, Nicaragua and Vietnam, or
workers and intellectuals in Poland, Hungary and the Soviet Union
itself. No cold calculation of the balance of power need deter
people who are persuaded that their cause is just....We don't have
to engage in grand, heroic actions to participate in the process of
change. Small acts, when multiplied by millions of people, can
transform the world..""
more
|
Gorbachev hits out at US over nuclear weapon arsenals,
Hindustan Times 21 April 2005
"...The United States has come in for strong criticism from
former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev for advising other
countries against acquiring nuclear weapons while refusing to
destroy its own arsenal. In his first public appearance at the UN
since his historic "glasnost" address to the General Assembly in
1988, Gorbachev said the United States was "hypocritical" over
nuclear armaments and not prepared to eliminate its own such arms.
"I think Russia is ready to cooperate. Now the question is, is the
United States -- the only remaining superpower -- ready to do this?
I think not myself," he said at a function at United Nations
headquarters where he presented the Cranston Peace Award to CNN
founder Ted Turner. "I think the United States is sick. It suffers
from sickness, disease of being the victor and it needs to cure
itself," he said. He advised Washington against suggesting that
other countries have no need for nuclear weapons while it retains a
large arsenal itself. "They say other people don't need it, but what
kind of law is this that they are advocating? It's the law of the
jungle," he said.
After receiving the award, instituted by
the Global Security Institute, Turner suggested a ten-year plan to
make the world free of nuclear weapons.
"Every country that
has nuclear weapons should undertake to reduce the arsenal by ten
per cent each year. That way the balance of power will remain the
same and at the end of ten years, there would be no nuclear weapons
left," Turner said.
Turner, who had established the UN
Foundation with his $1 billion contribution to support United
Nations goals, was honoured on Wednesday for his "outstanding work
to end threats posed by nuclear weapons, his advocacy for
sustainable development and his visionary leadership in
communications".
Turner said it was "hypocrisy" for the US
with 30,000 nuclear weapons to ask other countries not to have them.
"I don't think we have ever said anything about Israel's nuclear
weapons and I don't see how we can say anything about anybody when
we have got so many ourselves," he said.
Earlier, addressing
a press conference, Turner said he was an "abolitionist." "I believe
we ought to get rid of all (those weapons) as quickly as we can," he
said, adding that while perhaps nothing could stop nations from
"cheating" and building one or two weapons but they would not
destroy the world. "After we get rid of all those weapons, the next
step would be to preserve the environment," he said.
Gorbachev said he continued to stand by his position, and that of
late US President Ronald Reagan, that no one could win a nuclear
war."That being the case, weapons must be substantially reduced and
eliminated. Military doctrines need to be reviewed and trust between
all interested parties needed to be restored," he added.
|
Condoleezza Rice brings reality check on India-U.S. ties
- Siddharth Varadarajan in the Hindu, 16 March 2005
"In publicly expressing her concerns about
the Iran-India gas pipeline during her press conference here on
Wednesday, the visiting United States Secretary of State,
Condoleezza Rice, made it clear that
India's energy security and the Indo-U.S. "strategic
partnership" will matter less to Washington than its policy of
isolating and undermining the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Dr.
Rice also dropped a broad hint that the Indian aspiration for a
greater role in international affairs would be better served not
through reform of the United Nations, and a permanent seat in the
Security Council, but through ad hoc U.S.-led multilateral
initiatives such as the controversial and short-lived "core group"
set up by Washington in the wake of last year's tsunami.
For the first time since India and the U.S. inaugurated their
"strategic partnership," then, it is evident that on the two key
issues animating policymakers here, energy security and a
greater role for India in a multipolar world, Washington is keen on
defining the rules and setting the limits and that there is little
congruence of interest.
While both India and the U.S. agree
that today's world is no longer the world of 1945, the change that
each country perceives is radically different. New Delhi sees the
rise of a number of new powers, itself included, who need to be
accommodated in a formal power structure. Washington, however, sees
only the rise of its own strength, untrammelled by the presence of
any rival power. India wants the U.N. Security Council to reflect
the change that it believes has occurred. But the Bush
administration believes the U.N. system has to be reformed to
accommodate the reality of U.S. power and that if this does not
happen, the U.N. itself will be made irrelevant..."
|
India: The Poverty of
Progress - Chandasi Pandya
1 August 2005
“(America’s) Silicon Valley companies are based on 'know what.'
They know the market, they know the technology and they know what
products to make to earn money. (India’s) Coolie Valley companies
are based on 'know how.' They do the software coding for other
companies that have the 'know what.' If you tell them what to do,
they know how and will do it for you.” The Asian “coolies” of the
late 1800s and early 1900s came to the U.S., Australia, New Zealand
and the West Indies as laborers, doing the physical, backbreaking
work westerners didn’t want to do. ... In this new century, India’s
tech workers are coming to be seen as nothing more than glamorized
coolies (rich coolies, but coolies still). For the global corporate
sector, India is just one large back office, not a formidable
economic force such as China or even a political nuisance such as
Pakistan." more
|
|